For CTOs & technology leaders

Enterprise AI in Production

AI doesn’t need to replace your architecture. It needs to work inside it.

We help you integrate AI decision-making into the systems, data and workflows you already run, and we prove it works on your own data before it goes into production.

  • Accuracy
  • Cost
  • Performance
  • Integration
Benchmark your AI use case →

Four questions to answer before AI goes into production

Getting a good answer from AI in a demo is easy. Before it goes into a production workflow, you need answers to four harder questions:

Accuracy

Can I trust it?

Cost

What will it cost at scale?

Performance

Will it perform?

Integration

How does it fit our existing architecture?

Don’t take AI performance on faith. Test it on your data.

Every organisation has different data, different business rules and a different tolerance for error. A vendor benchmark or a polished demo tells you little about how a model will behave on your workload.

Before AI goes into a production workflow, we take representative historical data, define the decisions that need to be made, and benchmark the model against your existing outcomes.

This gives you evidence to answer:

  • How accurate is it on our data?
  • How much of the workload could we automate?
  • Where should we require human review?
  • What will it cost at our actual volume?
  • What latency can we expect in production?

Measure before you commit.

Accuracy: automate what the data supports

Most AI decisions are treated as simply right or wrong. The models we use for decision workflows return a probability or confidence value with every answer, so the workflow can respond to how certain the model is:

The objective isn’t to automate everything. It’s to automate what the data supports.

A confidence score doesn’t make a decision safe on its own. The benchmark tells you what share of your workload could potentially be automated at a defined confidence threshold, and where human review should remain. You then set each threshold according to what an error would cost: a wrong ticket route is not the same as a wrong credit decision.

Cost: measure the economics at your actual volume

The real question isn’t what the AI model costs. It’s the cost per decision, and what that does to the cost of running the workflow. If AI can handle a large share of a workload that currently needs manual review, the comparison is:

With AI

  • AI processing cost
  • Remaining human review
  • Existing infrastructure
versus

Today

  • Current cost of processing the workload

With decision-oriented models, the AI processing line can be very small. Jev, for example, is priced per input token, with output free:

$0.042
Per 1 million input tokens
$0.00
Output tokens are free
≈ $273
Illustrative: 10 million records at ~650 input tokens each

That shifts the conversation away from the price per token and towards the economic impact on your operation, which the benchmark measures.

Illustrative figure: 10M × 650 tokens = 6.5 billion input tokens × $0.042 per million. Real token counts depend on your data and questions. Pricing per TypeSafe’s published model page, which is subject to change.

What we’ll measure

MeasureWhat it tells you
AccuracyHow well the AI performs on your data
Automation rateHow much of the workload can be handled automatically
Review rateHow much still requires people
Cost per decisionWhat each automated decision costs
LatencyWhether it fits your operational workflow
Error impactWhat happens when the AI gets it wrong
Infrastructure impactWhat changes, if anything, are required

Performance: AI that operates inside the workflow

If a model takes seconds to answer, AI ends up as a slow batch step at the end of a process. Decision-oriented models are fast enough to sit inside an API call, a form submission or a pipeline stage:

~100 ms
Typical Jev query time, per TypeSafe’s documentation
114 ms
Mean round trip for an 8-question call in a TypeSafe-published benchmark
0.8–13 s
The same task through the general-purpose LLMs in that benchmark

Published figures are a starting point. The benchmark measures latency on your data, in your environment.

Add AI to your architecture. Don’t rebuild it.

Your existing systems are valuable assets. AI should work with them, not force you to replace them. The AI decision becomes one more step in a workflow you already run:

We integrate AI into existing:

  • Databases
  • APIs
  • ETL pipelines
  • CRM
  • ERP
  • AWS
  • SaaS platforms
  • Custom applications
  • Existing AI / LLM workflows

From AI experiment to production in five steps

  1. 01

    Identify

    Find a workflow where AI could create measurable value.

  2. 02

    Benchmark

    Run representative historical data through the proposed AI workflow.

  3. 03

    Measure

    Evaluate accuracy, confidence thresholds, automation potential, cost and latency.

  4. 04

    Integrate

    Connect the AI decision layer to your existing data and business systems.

  5. 05

    Deploy

    Move into production with monitoring, thresholds and human escalation where appropriate.

Why IT-ISS

AI expertise is only part of the problem. Production AI has to work with databases, APIs, cloud infrastructure, security, existing applications and business processes.

IT Integrated Business Solutions has been designing, tuning and operating those systems since 2006, from enterprise databases across Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL and MySQL to AWS cloud architecture and custom software. We aren’t an AI consultancy that has learned to call an AI API. We understand the systems AI has to live inside.

One example: TypeSafe’s Jev

We select the technology based on the problem. Jev, from TypeSafe, is particularly interesting for high-volume, structured decision workflows. It is designed for machine-to-machine decisions rather than conversational responses: it classifies, scores, routes and filters data, and returns a typed answer with a probability or confidence value that your code can act on directly.

For a CTO, that means decisions that can be measured, thresholded and audited, at a cost and speed that make AI viable in high-volume workflows.

Frequently asked questions

How do we know whether AI will work on our data?

We benchmark it. We take representative historical data, define the decisions the workflow needs to make, and run the proposed AI workflow against your existing outcomes. That measures accuracy, automation rate, review rate, cost per decision and latency on your data, before anything goes into production.

Can AI decisions be trusted in production?

A confidence score doesn’t make a decision safe on its own. The models we use for decision workflows return a probability or confidence value with every answer, and the benchmark shows what share of your workload could potentially be automated at a defined confidence threshold, and where human review should remain. You set each threshold according to what an error would cost your business.

What will AI cost at our volume?

The useful measure is cost per decision: AI processing cost, plus remaining human review, plus existing infrastructure, compared with what the workload costs to process today. With decision-oriented models the AI processing cost can be very small. Jev, for example, is priced at $0.042 per million input tokens with output free, so 10 million records at about 650 input tokens each comes to roughly $273.

Is AI fast enough for operational workflows?

Decision-oriented models can be. TypeSafe’s documentation says most Jev queries complete in about 100 ms, and in one of its published benchmarks an 8-question call averaged 114 ms, compared with 0.8 to 13 seconds for general-purpose LLMs on the same task. The benchmark measures latency on your data, in your environment.

Do we need to change our data architecture?

No. The AI decision becomes one more step in a workflow you already run: database, API, AI decision, business rules, action. Your databases, APIs, ETL pipelines, CRM and ERP systems, AWS infrastructure, SaaS platforms and custom applications stay in place.

Are you tied to a particular AI model?

No. We select the technology based on the problem. TypeSafe’s Jev is one example we use because it is particularly well suited to high-volume, structured decision workflows. Where a different model or approach fits your workload better, we will recommend that instead.

What is Jev?

Jev is TypeSafe’s decision-oriented AI model, designed for machine-to-machine decisions rather than conversational responses. It classifies, scores, routes and filters data, returning a typed answer with a probability or confidence value that software can act on directly. Your engineering team can read the detail in How Jev Works or try it in the live Jev Showcase.

What happens when we get in touch?

We work through five steps: identify a workflow where AI could create measurable value, benchmark it on representative historical data, measure accuracy, thresholds, automation potential, cost and latency, integrate the AI decision layer with your existing systems, and deploy with monitoring and human escalation where appropriate. It starts with a conversation about your use case and a representative sample of your data. Benchmark your use case.

Have an AI workflow you’re considering?

Bring us a representative sample of your data and we’ll help you determine whether AI can deliver the accuracy, economics and performance you need.

Benchmark your use case →